Over the past thirty years, Candida Höfer has been interested in “public spaces,” focusing on the interiors of libraries, museums, opera theatres, palaces, banks and churches spread throughout many cities in the world. In representing these spaces Höfer distinguishes herself by excluding the presence of people and dealing with the implied relationship between space and its inhabitants. The interior spaces that she captures are typically seen as centers of cultural activities, accustomed to being filled with visitors. Thus, the absence of people in these spaces evokes an unnatural feeling in the viewers, functioning as an ironical yet significant reminder of the core existence of human beings.
While the presence of human beings is missing in Höfer’s photographs, it is by no means an empty space that she portrays. According to Höfer, her spaces are animated by light, form, pattern, and references to the human presence, which can be felt if not seen. Truly enough, her photographs impart considerable importance to the subtleness of color and light, structural aesthetic of form and perspective, and detailed surface textures. Thus, another distinguishing feature of Candida Höfer’s photographs is that it carries with it a remarkably rich yet delicate aesthetic sensibility. The geometrical forms of circle, half-circle, and triangles that are repeated in patterns and the soft light that subtly encompasses the harmonious colors create an abstractly beautiful surface.
Born in Eberswalde, near Berlin, in 1944, Candida Höfer attended the Kunstakademie Düsseldorf where she studied film with Ole John and photography with Bernd Becher. Since 1975, she has participated in numerous group as well as solo exhibitions. She was included in Documenta 11 in Kassel in 2002, and represented Germany at the Venice Biennale in the following year, together with the late Martin Kippenberger. In 2006 she had a solo show at the Louvre Museum where she presented her works based on the interior spaces of the museum itself. Since her first show in 2005, this is her second solo show at Kukje Gallery.
Another effect of the absence of people is the perfect and idealistic creation of a space that purely preserves the concept of systematic order. Paradoxically, in order to create an ideal space that is primitively tranquil, pure and sublime, human beings that create and utilize that space must disappear from the scene. Human existence ultimately creates noise, dust and waste, inevitably intervening with emotions and stories. In Höfer’s works, everything that is transient, fragmentary and unpredictable is gone with the elimination of human beings.
Her work seems to be based on the belief that the space has affected the people who had loitered and passed by it over time, while the space in turn has been influenced by the collective way of thinking of its inhabitants.
While the presence of human beings is missing in Höfer’s photographs, it is by no means an empty space that she portrays. According to Höfer, her spaces are animated by light, form, pattern, and references to the human presence, which can be felt if not seen. Truly enough, her photographs impart considerable importance to the subtleness of color and light, structural aesthetic of form and perspective, and detailed surface textures. Thus, another distinguishing feature of Candida Höfer’s photographs is that it carries with it a remarkably rich yet delicate aesthetic sensibility. The geometrical forms of circle, half-circle, and triangles that are repeated in patterns and the soft light that subtly encompasses the harmonious colors seem more than sufficient to create an abstractly beautiful picture plane.
As she forgoes any staging of the locations and photographs the raw space itself, Höfer attaches importance to the conflicting yet harmonious relationships created by the various elements that dwell in it. This results from a balancing act between a variety of oppositions or tensions. While the libraries, churches, palaces, and museums portrayed in her works are principally public spaces open to anyone, the activities enacted in these spaces such as reading, praying or appreciating a performance or an artwork are ultimately very personal experiences. Consequently, the public spaces are an accumulation of numerous personal experiences. Human presence, if not physically revealed, is implied or suggested in a subtle yet significant way. In addition, while the architectural aesthetic of space is maximized through the dramatic perspective, it visually exudes a sense of beautiful abstract surface at the same time. Strict symmetry and stable balance brings harmony to the tension created by the enhanced perspective. The simple and geometric structure coexists with the lavish and elaborate detail.
Höfer usually does not remain for more than a couple of hours at the location of photographing in order to prevent subjective emotions from entering her work. This is also the reason that she simply employs the name of the buildings she photographs as the title of her works. The intention of the artist is to maintain objectivity without affecting the spectator’s personal appreciation and translation. Her space encompasses various complex personal experiences through its public quality and is humanized through its relationship with people. In the same manner, Höfer’s photographic work bears an organic relationship with its viewers continuously creating new experiences, conversations and spaces.